|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-5-12 17:00:18
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 美国
阶段性的总结一下、希望对后来者有帮助：, Z: `7 G/ W) h9 F3 l) K- i
4 ]$ ~: E5 j, o# g3 Q$ ^
网友wumatao和wuzhijian分享的经验：另存一下，似乎会减小文件大小，不妨试试
3 _1 Y; p. k$ {$ P' C3 a, C* g【我验证过、很有效、装配体文件大小可以从几百M变成1.9M】( B" d( R7 A; t% l
1 l: j) L, p' H) {8 o
' e% \! u0 c% E' T% T另外、后来在网上看到一些遇到相同问题的讨论：2 }" Q8 W5 H2 a5 A- C
3 x1 }. p o" j$ F2 a# ^————————tdx99
/ p% u& [" u. ?2 O* B4 ] M4 pHello All,
) O; L( }6 l/ c/ L( ], p( ?- n
1 ~# s$ l$ m& h) m& V0 p: M# qI was asked to look into an issue with apart that an engineer designed. The saved part is 0 q4 q% H! v/ C5 Z0 M! X6 ?1 K
85megs! The part hasabout 100 features. One of my part with about the same number of 2 z7 Y/ i7 }8 Q- ^+ u& Q {
features is less then10 megs. Both the engineer and Iare fairly new to SW so I couldn't + }! @1 Y5 M7 J' [! e: M: s
figure out what the problem was.All features weremade from simple extrusions, cuts, 5 ?# I! X5 N5 ]8 ~3 m) q5 T
patterns, chamfers, rounds. No complicated surfaces and not drafted yet. I did notice that
6 v) v( g4 B4 @5 A2 W/ oa lot of the extrusion and cut features were created as thins." X& `) t7 Y& ]- F
( K. X, ]( ?2 {$ e) y- l/ VI would hate to have to recreate the part.
6 Q5 T5 r+ p$ L6 a* G7 `, ?
9 o8 J z' o* W0 Y& v" z: B: eAny help would be appreciated.
` G8 f: f. J9 Y' A2 Z% k
: E1 X+ Z: d% |7 m& a p* YThank you,
8 D( g$ M% F- O+ y6 V
( ~ W/ }: ?# t+ J* ]- t——————————Metoo' N9 v! [% H0 ?
This is a problem in Solidworks; two people can design the same identical part and the two 5 d: \2 B; p3 S2 D) ?3 q
part file sizes can vary widely. If one made lots of changes; rebuilt his model numerous
+ {6 j/ Z+ Z: d/ Ttimes withmoved features in the tree; added and removed constraints, modified scetches,
' h$ l! c: W1 ]7 s% y: @etc, etc..., that file will grow and grow and grow.
* }9 B3 c8 \# g3 }3 v4 k- ~; `6 a1 U5 k; s6 }0 ~) z3 p
Here's the question - do you really need the feature tree? If its a simple part, then its 10 - ; S% O! w1 y! n2 ~) d7 V
15 minutes to redo. If its a complex part, then the feature tree is worthless anyway; save it P& t+ }$ O" O) _
out as an iges or parasolid and bring it back in as dumb surface/solid. If you need to make
! u( T( p* n5 rchanges to it afterwards, then cut off what isn't needed and add what is. There's nothing " r% s: C& v. Q J
mystical or magical about having a feature history with a part model.+ }8 D& s% Z+ M9 g7 g
& n3 d6 ~: k& F! X# W% Q; N
——————————tdx996 n O: O1 g5 x8 t/ M
Thanks for shedding some light on the problem. We had a design review and quite a few Y5 x7 }* F7 `* `/ s+ [
changes were made. Now the file is over 140meg. It takes about a minute to save the darn
1 Y' Z: w& r& I# L, \4 W6 Upart now. Is there any way to purge.. or trim the fat off of this thing? It is getting to the 0 H/ d' ^3 |! o; t1 F
point where it would be better to recreate the part.8 ^. z+ e7 i- }3 A
l$ c& T" B: ^' ]+ h4 m——————————Meto
( `5 P! `; s% A! c' O+ sFirst; get rid of all the fluff; studio, lighting, background graphics; all the stuff that has
6 n% r$ D3 F3 g0 @. Q/ _+ J' X& }nothing to do with the part design. Go to your file options, and check the graphics display 7 o4 s {6 o+ {) K! W/ k, b" L
resolution to be sure it isn't unreasonably set high, as well as associated setting. When all ; L* q$ t4 r; R: N6 J2 y
else fails, remodel the part.$ {( P3 U! k U! O
# w. B* T+ A" Z4 x. O1 iI have noticed that similar files have exhibited a size reduction when opened and saved in + l3 X0 a: e5 {8 Q2 v2 V, D, A" s
next higher version of Solidworks. This recently happened when the company I was
! ^5 D: h% l3 \5 H. M" b. M' fcontracting for moved from 2007 to 2008.A mold part I was working onsaved in 2008 at ! p# M! k5 \7 ~* f& e" ^
about half the size as in 2007. That filealso had numerous changes to it, and I was about * R% Z+ J/ ^) }( w+ w. C; Z, ?( W
to save it out as a parasolid and bring it back in as a dumb model to reduce the size of 3 o2 G4 s9 N: J$ b# Z& v
assembly file before I noticed the part size dropped from about 100 meg to about 55 meg.
; X( b: o0 t2 V0 }6 e8 y
- T4 u k5 g" _ o! q2 d* }——————————ProE_Addict
# q& k6 g. R f% l. W0 OI don't recommend "saving out and bring it back in as dumb geometry." At that point " T3 u8 G% }, _8 o3 L: ]
you've just spent a lot of time creating your masterpiece only to destroy thebeauty of the / r" b0 @2 P1 H7 @+ J
parametric software. d% `1 X& x$ R; H; @; E
6 q+ i/ R, H/ X3 r1 K0 x5 ^If you can, do a File, Save As. This usually does the trick. I believe SW saves a lot of history . h4 r# L* }, l" v2 P) f5 u' P
data within each file. When you do a Save As, that history goes bye-bye and you start fresh.
4 c9 T% B7 n5 z
! L" R, _* Z, c3 X# t' d——————————FireWild- h0 f% h+ k6 d) {( R6 ^
I had this same problem with a Solid Works Part a few months ago I tried the save as trick 4 N# l! v' a9 D$ x
and it did not work I even sent it in to Support and they were not able to figure it out either. For the record I've never had this problem with a Pro-e part.
% H, _0 o! V$ _/ z5 `( T. d$ a% n+ J, z$ u6 F. w: F# d
——————————michael3130
; S! {$ ~/ ?# S6 T% \# [0 |% jYes, absolutely you need the feature tree.1 S( H$ ^+ {! ?& c
* A4 e4 ]. Y& P$ w4 R }% S* O% g
If its a complicated part, the feature tree is worthless if you don't know how to model a
" w B8 a% e0 D. t; Lpart properly. Seeting out a plan from the start to build your part, anticipating as best you 7 ^, a7 A9 E: Y) ^8 @6 A, Y
can changes that may occur in the future and through past experience, a complicated part
$ D% Z3 m5 @$ {6 x4 X8 Hcan be adjusted from the very 1st feature very successfully. It very much comes down to & s# p, U4 X- p; @6 u
the skill of the CAD user and this is one of the areas that makes the difference between
4 ^ x' p0 \8 H3 E9 `# Ysomeone who says they can use a 3D CAD package and someone who can actually use it.0 x1 c( |9 O) C: @
% E& o: b; \0 W* U
If the tree was useless, there would be no posts from users on this forum looking for ! r- ?5 i2 d! _+ L0 U5 C. O
workarounds to the problem of saving to an earlier version of the software. Though as I'm
% M* O" k( u+ q: K3 [8 U/ n3 C. Hsure you will see if you look that there are many.: _8 z' Q. \# h
$ E: \6 l2 H0 [6 ~9 B8 a6 P2 B* V
|
|
发表于 2015-5-9 19:26:56
发表于 2015-5-11 10:55:02
欢迎发表～～
、覆盖上一个 另存为......
发表于 2015-5-13 20:09:48
