|
|
发表于 2006-2-24 00:58:05
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 中国黑龙江哈尔滨
我试了一下，确实有变化，但效果如何还有待考验，反正也不耽误我什么，如果真有效果就赚了！
1 M- w5 Z+ g$ y6 @8 [- O谢谢搂主题供！
( T; C% x. B6 u- ?1 F( ?7 u
( w# s9 Y1 ~* STCP options string = 020405a00103030201010402/ b1 q% }" {1 q' I
" a! K1 t: z s( o( w
MTU = 1480
6 R5 Y1 n# ]6 W5 Z7 WMTU is optimized for Windows XP PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput./ e4 ~+ a9 u t: x; ?& C; i+ z2 V' V8 m
8 Z3 a, B9 }& E) T4 ^1 DMSS = 1440
' `$ x5 A5 D3 d( v# K# uMSS is optimized for Windows XP PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.4 n H! i. J; W- Z$ x" s7 [! [
+ f& T M; w! a/ |. f# u3 B6 XDefault TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 256320
7 K8 r- l- T9 o9 k- Y& MRWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4)- `8 s2 s6 k" U1 f, h: S3 a
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64080 " I, E) B' A9 \* [
0 h4 i F: P/ D9 p7 T7 `, B" V
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
' V! |! N/ `2 L7 `Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
( ?* J& l" \' _9 r& t4 l! M" s: L506880 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8) L) b: C+ c2 z$ W" R" X* v' a9 p0 c
253440 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)! t# s7 P* Z% }' a; H
126720 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2). {2 J/ b4 f7 U/ m4 w" r4 @, Z
63360 (MSS x 44)
+ R( q1 ]1 ^9 Y. S2 A; @
) b" c1 ?7 R1 b- B$ f# q* {bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):4 _& u5 |8 M# Y y
, ?& l+ U6 i: ?+ p) q4 @Your TCP Window limits you to: 10252.8 kbps (1281.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
& H3 c& @ \1 |3 `5 Q) g* DYour TCP Window limits you to: 4101.12 kbps (512.64 KBytes/s) @ 500ms |
|
