|
|
发表于 2006-2-24 00:58:05
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 中国黑龙江哈尔滨
我试了一下，确实有变化，但效果如何还有待考验，反正也不耽误我什么，如果真有效果就赚了！" ?4 S& e. `: ^: W8 G* r' }
谢谢搂主题供！3 X) x/ L0 F5 A R' K; y3 T
/ n) Q3 \# p. ], eTCP options string = 020405a00103030201010402/ N- v' }1 ^1 q. ?
, K0 V ~" L. b! j$ iMTU = 14804 ?% j. `3 o/ S4 u( w$ T
MTU is optimized for Windows XP PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
- a2 [: \% `7 u$ S
$ L& n5 G1 T& [% n3 xMSS = 1440
1 u7 ~& w" p" f# `4 Q/ ?MSS is optimized for Windows XP PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value.
; v o' f/ `7 e& Z 3 s h, a$ p* C( D
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 256320 " T8 d4 \0 {8 ?6 H5 N6 `
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4)
7 e+ \6 i2 V5 _; g# I: j2 ]Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64080 2 j4 t* l& @; Z: X) r0 V7 M, W$ t% q
. g1 d- q* w3 o* W4 X
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
4 C( D; Y0 u/ L& }% y0 `Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: , L5 d8 D' H. {
506880 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)1 v' w; J% s9 O9 j4 v9 n# o$ A
253440 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
, Q0 N( B. Q5 s8 c126720 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
; O0 n" }# T0 z$ q3 x( U* {. e) @ 63360 (MSS x 44)
5 T2 n0 n8 }. O3 I0 n8 l, ?
2 Y' R+ k" V& _3 c) Mbandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
; j% } R$ X# _
7 \ ^& l j, U0 H( a5 D5 [. ^Your TCP Window limits you to: 10252.8 kbps (1281.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
, ]- v- `- u' T3 dYour TCP Window limits you to: 4101.12 kbps (512.64 KBytes/s) @ 500ms |
|
