|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-5-12 17:00:18
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 美国
阶段性的总结一下、希望对后来者有帮助：: A2 j4 y: ?0 H' S6 d
4 ?( l0 ?0 |8 B q f. l
网友wumatao和wuzhijian分享的经验：另存一下，似乎会减小文件大小，不妨试试
% o/ P4 c* i: T% x! [" Y【我验证过、很有效、装配体文件大小可以从几百M变成1.9M】 Z' r& Z& @- O2 T, Y
! M8 w& {8 A& s+ |
/ [; i2 e! G7 S3 _8 z
另外、后来在网上看到一些遇到相同问题的讨论：8 G8 b( p: l# q4 M! X) @" [2 h4 Z
% t; H5 J: N. @: i4 n————————tdx99- o3 |. `4 R( u7 C: q5 u/ j
Hello All,
_# s5 ]) a1 V+ F; H5 h/ f0 `( ?: |7 S e, {" {. n6 {
I was asked to look into an issue with apart that an engineer designed. The saved part is : z6 D. x& }/ S# Q4 `7 w
85megs! The part hasabout 100 features. One of my part with about the same number of + V0 H3 s3 I5 c8 H" e
features is less then10 megs. Both the engineer and Iare fairly new to SW so I couldn't
+ x. K# P m! b6 W2 L/ }figure out what the problem was.All features weremade from simple extrusions, cuts,
* m( j$ P: |) \$ M# @patterns, chamfers, rounds. No complicated surfaces and not drafted yet. I did notice that
4 \; n) a$ s1 {# T; D& }1 e$ D0 ma lot of the extrusion and cut features were created as thins.0 k+ u! s" V! N
7 q4 t: z4 ]4 ?I would hate to have to recreate the part.
! X6 |9 g! t& m3 t# j: N
3 S& [6 W0 F* n. [, uAny help would be appreciated.
5 ^5 G$ f3 X# }9 x& U5 y* q
) D) D2 A& \! s$ E, gThank you,! p' o( ~. ~$ d: P4 r/ Z# Q
1 q, f1 ~; }! Z3 D; S7 k2 i
——————————Metoo9 m6 z" D# D D8 {
This is a problem in Solidworks; two people can design the same identical part and the two ' n$ [3 v# L; }2 ~- h& G
part file sizes can vary widely. If one made lots of changes; rebuilt his model numerous & b# w9 q9 E3 J" G
times withmoved features in the tree; added and removed constraints, modified scetches, 0 K* e- K# \3 w4 e8 p+ X
etc, etc..., that file will grow and grow and grow. s3 D+ v% h1 m6 k) c0 h
, q; E7 X, a: r9 c. p3 {7 S9 M3 qHere's the question - do you really need the feature tree? If its a simple part, then its 10 -
3 l% b, e9 o# E) h- L! P15 minutes to redo. If its a complex part, then the feature tree is worthless anyway; save it
& o' s$ U1 F1 ?out as an iges or parasolid and bring it back in as dumb surface/solid. If you need to make
5 I) ~" w6 a# H0 m, k4 N* ychanges to it afterwards, then cut off what isn't needed and add what is. There's nothing 7 a; ~0 w- o/ h. F- ?! y0 ]/ S% h( C, @
mystical or magical about having a feature history with a part model.) T+ m- r0 W5 V3 W' G6 a b
) N0 v | o4 p4 \/ |! F8 e5 Q& c——————————tdx999 y) L7 |/ B; ?: \. m, C/ B3 m
Thanks for shedding some light on the problem. We had a design review and quite a few . B( S. m: j( g8 U6 Z5 l' J
changes were made. Now the file is over 140meg. It takes about a minute to save the darn
! \1 d" g0 X) q4 b5 n& zpart now. Is there any way to purge.. or trim the fat off of this thing? It is getting to the
" b' b1 i2 e! {) [5 Cpoint where it would be better to recreate the part.
* j6 f4 ]6 h; G) d% I$ L8 p1 ~: y2 {/ \3 ~' w
——————————Meto
. O: ?6 R0 j! FFirst; get rid of all the fluff; studio, lighting, background graphics; all the stuff that has 1 D" E4 ?* D" O9 J& Q s
nothing to do with the part design. Go to your file options, and check the graphics display ' ~5 K' t' n" M9 A" u
resolution to be sure it isn't unreasonably set high, as well as associated setting. When all
: ^" J- K1 o1 Qelse fails, remodel the part.4 c, [+ \: z3 A* {. H/ |) d( e
9 m/ v6 S! F& t
I have noticed that similar files have exhibited a size reduction when opened and saved in
* E4 t! [" X- jnext higher version of Solidworks. This recently happened when the company I was
6 D- i$ R* o/ w. mcontracting for moved from 2007 to 2008.A mold part I was working onsaved in 2008 at
' Z9 v8 Y& `8 e1 V+ l/ y* jabout half the size as in 2007. That filealso had numerous changes to it, and I was about
$ e, Z$ w1 S/ d$ R7 V) @4 f. Vto save it out as a parasolid and bring it back in as a dumb model to reduce the size of v% t+ R/ L1 D
assembly file before I noticed the part size dropped from about 100 meg to about 55 meg.
/ o& y& D" D/ e& s
/ [ c4 k6 L3 Q' R——————————ProE_Addict
9 c3 T) C" Z" t1 nI don't recommend "saving out and bring it back in as dumb geometry." At that point
; { }9 V1 x/ ~7 a3 z; J4 xyou've just spent a lot of time creating your masterpiece only to destroy thebeauty of the # ^3 B4 G% A8 N' D& j$ Q! g
parametric software.
$ Z# F9 t" n, Y1 S7 U$ B0 H4 _) ~4 j) F+ n9 L$ b0 T0 J# G
If you can, do a File, Save As. This usually does the trick. I believe SW saves a lot of history 9 @: v6 ?4 B: Z. c! h6 V1 }
data within each file. When you do a Save As, that history goes bye-bye and you start fresh.) O% t% v6 ^1 d
, b: ?8 s6 S" N% _7 Z——————————FireWild( O. c/ U9 |- u- c* g5 ]
I had this same problem with a Solid Works Part a few months ago I tried the save as trick
: C: b8 |8 E; b land it did not work I even sent it in to Support and they were not able to figure it out either. For the record I've never had this problem with a Pro-e part.& A+ F/ r* S' k, J& a0 }% d
& ?% F0 n1 i6 Y, P+ }
——————————michael3130
4 n5 A% ], T2 a TYes, absolutely you need the feature tree.
6 I/ Z0 F# z) O
6 b) s3 L8 Z3 x. U/ ], aIf its a complicated part, the feature tree is worthless if you don't know how to model a ( H, ^0 d) n O1 L, z
part properly. Seeting out a plan from the start to build your part, anticipating as best you 2 T: J5 c4 ^/ @- P( {
can changes that may occur in the future and through past experience, a complicated part
9 k& l5 v' F! X# w2 b" \can be adjusted from the very 1st feature very successfully. It very much comes down to # U2 k) w5 d! B, x3 @
the skill of the CAD user and this is one of the areas that makes the difference between
. m q1 j( |8 ]# fsomeone who says they can use a 3D CAD package and someone who can actually use it.' z' ?! Y6 B" W5 [: Y
" v0 H# y9 `& r2 {# Y1 m/ PIf the tree was useless, there would be no posts from users on this forum looking for
" n/ J' E k4 n- D( R; D1 {2 Mworkarounds to the problem of saving to an earlier version of the software. Though as I'm
" R4 W( [% N B2 m* l8 fsure you will see if you look that there are many., D5 G% R- d- y! p" h
. e: v K5 d" ^! p: f8 P
|
|
发表于 2015-5-9 19:26:56
发表于 2015-5-11 10:55:02
欢迎发表～～
、覆盖上一个 另存为......
发表于 2015-5-13 20:09:48
