|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-5-12 17:00:18
|
显示全部楼层
来自： 美国
阶段性的总结一下、希望对后来者有帮助：
( |: l% Z# U" y
0 v3 o9 G* v6 ?网友wumatao和wuzhijian分享的经验：另存一下，似乎会减小文件大小，不妨试试! [& s% c; {; v# K9 j6 i
【我验证过、很有效、装配体文件大小可以从几百M变成1.9M】# W7 `9 v8 H% u- ?$ i" G
9 o4 F7 o# X5 ~8 L6 y3 k4 ], z
1 Y s; ^& a9 D3 z p2 ~另外、后来在网上看到一些遇到相同问题的讨论：( |" `0 G A/ T' m* F
% D# y! s7 \& f, p————————tdx99
o. l Z h5 d% tHello All,
3 u3 y; C% H) P; r8 ?1 T3 A
0 U* w9 Z' C# N7 K7 JI was asked to look into an issue with apart that an engineer designed. The saved part is
+ m$ D. J9 w' F! m% A& D D( R85megs! The part hasabout 100 features. One of my part with about the same number of
% m/ g6 w" v3 o7 j' ?features is less then10 megs. Both the engineer and Iare fairly new to SW so I couldn't
! o9 ]: ]7 B# T! y% D- Xfigure out what the problem was.All features weremade from simple extrusions, cuts, ; S0 v. k. L" ^
patterns, chamfers, rounds. No complicated surfaces and not drafted yet. I did notice that
! g$ z+ }. Z, w3 c0 H2 xa lot of the extrusion and cut features were created as thins.3 t; E$ O+ V# [3 f- _2 f1 q
6 D1 Z8 Y6 R! P9 A5 F( I
I would hate to have to recreate the part.& Q4 q9 p$ f* ^6 S6 L
4 Y- ^) P& B% }' e) @Any help would be appreciated.# Y# t# {0 S0 G5 `% ^5 [! w2 g
! H. S) c: Q- M! ZThank you,: U5 }4 G( F R1 J
6 R: r7 b/ l7 u8 m$ E) y# J+ x
——————————Metoo* ~+ i. X' B8 t# l
This is a problem in Solidworks; two people can design the same identical part and the two
& k! d: P5 k, fpart file sizes can vary widely. If one made lots of changes; rebuilt his model numerous
7 R, [+ e1 U1 K( o4 a4 Ztimes withmoved features in the tree; added and removed constraints, modified scetches, / E% G( R( k2 I, v6 s8 C
etc, etc..., that file will grow and grow and grow. : c5 j* ?( i+ R* V
/ g& b8 Q7 g* o# P6 K! B h4 pHere's the question - do you really need the feature tree? If its a simple part, then its 10 -
$ m b2 s7 i) G9 G# K15 minutes to redo. If its a complex part, then the feature tree is worthless anyway; save it
3 o* ~4 R$ [% ~$ vout as an iges or parasolid and bring it back in as dumb surface/solid. If you need to make
3 P8 L- z0 s8 cchanges to it afterwards, then cut off what isn't needed and add what is. There's nothing
6 k+ v3 i* V7 I( p+ Dmystical or magical about having a feature history with a part model.& M* n' e( V; E
8 x9 j) a) f+ C——————————tdx99- u; ?" I2 y- c% s8 {
Thanks for shedding some light on the problem. We had a design review and quite a few
8 Y* p" N5 `! zchanges were made. Now the file is over 140meg. It takes about a minute to save the darn . K# z1 L9 E& j7 @; r, g
part now. Is there any way to purge.. or trim the fat off of this thing? It is getting to the
1 P# B5 M% U( }3 ?4 Wpoint where it would be better to recreate the part.
- @! t' G) P R, ~9 p& M
* c, H4 F; k; V w/ h8 l K——————————Meto
. r G$ p& P; i2 WFirst; get rid of all the fluff; studio, lighting, background graphics; all the stuff that has
- J* p/ r# k* l/ c0 i2 Jnothing to do with the part design. Go to your file options, and check the graphics display 7 s% |5 s" \6 J! C
resolution to be sure it isn't unreasonably set high, as well as associated setting. When all 5 T; P& M; I" Y4 B5 z; w
else fails, remodel the part.8 d" j; ?7 S- Y) C2 c$ R- y3 y
4 W- m8 l: ?' E1 M/ [) D8 R% t0 s$ ^
I have noticed that similar files have exhibited a size reduction when opened and saved in
/ f. i; E% l, i3 tnext higher version of Solidworks. This recently happened when the company I was ! v" u0 f6 t0 {5 O+ t
contracting for moved from 2007 to 2008.A mold part I was working onsaved in 2008 at 3 g& N3 u4 S5 ~; i
about half the size as in 2007. That filealso had numerous changes to it, and I was about 5 ^/ F; [+ ]; I$ X/ B. S$ w
to save it out as a parasolid and bring it back in as a dumb model to reduce the size of . I) ?/ |. y% q% t% E6 O- B
assembly file before I noticed the part size dropped from about 100 meg to about 55 meg.* I; {5 x/ W- L
$ c7 a2 f; J" `: J3 K
——————————ProE_Addict
) G3 X! N( X( @4 zI don't recommend "saving out and bring it back in as dumb geometry." At that point & W" _: W* W9 `0 ?$ r
you've just spent a lot of time creating your masterpiece only to destroy thebeauty of the , f/ R4 @% s; Q- I! u: x& Q+ c
parametric software.0 ?2 {* t* s, i' D
' L, v6 A7 F/ H. U3 J8 b
If you can, do a File, Save As. This usually does the trick. I believe SW saves a lot of history
( j# Q0 m8 W" J+ u' W2 \data within each file. When you do a Save As, that history goes bye-bye and you start fresh.+ ^7 ?3 L3 S$ W+ [: K1 h V
5 @ U8 F' a! W1 [( R——————————FireWild
- m/ {8 k# b4 m( c( y9 eI had this same problem with a Solid Works Part a few months ago I tried the save as trick 8 t1 m( g$ R- }$ d7 D* Y
and it did not work I even sent it in to Support and they were not able to figure it out either. For the record I've never had this problem with a Pro-e part.& s% u# h2 n3 b$ n6 o
5 y4 w3 a" T7 l) m
——————————michael31308 A+ @( l& ?. l6 K* {9 t: L. m" f
Yes, absolutely you need the feature tree. }( W) r$ G4 k; G2 O
/ k5 Y( z, N. l5 K3 J+ z8 F' Q0 G
If its a complicated part, the feature tree is worthless if you don't know how to model a ! ~* y' W7 H9 |5 r
part properly. Seeting out a plan from the start to build your part, anticipating as best you v- u! T4 L7 a" R) z( K" ~! G, x: d
can changes that may occur in the future and through past experience, a complicated part
, o# f/ {; R& Z' Rcan be adjusted from the very 1st feature very successfully. It very much comes down to / U' m! I/ u+ t/ y5 c5 r' O
the skill of the CAD user and this is one of the areas that makes the difference between % r/ i) N, P/ p
someone who says they can use a 3D CAD package and someone who can actually use it.. H7 [: |) _% X6 ?+ y
% ^: }% a+ o; {% gIf the tree was useless, there would be no posts from users on this forum looking for + x6 H/ v$ t9 n" A5 }
workarounds to the problem of saving to an earlier version of the software. Though as I'm : @" z* u/ ^2 x6 f
sure you will see if you look that there are many.( j" d/ q& ^) _2 L+ S' C
# b1 |2 K" F# a! K
|
|
发表于 2015-5-9 19:26:56
发表于 2015-5-11 10:55:02
欢迎发表～～, Y2 Y2 Z2 D i3 u
、覆盖上一个 另存为......
发表于 2015-5-13 20:09:48
